<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was Firefox Logo Inspired By Images From Hubble Telescope?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justtalkaboutweb.com/2008/04/14/was-firefox-logo-inspired-by-images-from-hubble-telescope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justtalkaboutweb.com/2008/04/14/was-firefox-logo-inspired-by-images-from-hubble-telescope/</link>
	<description>Techniques Behind Modern Web</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Alexander</title>
		<link>http://justtalkaboutweb.com/2008/04/14/was-firefox-logo-inspired-by-images-from-hubble-telescope/#comment-1314</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justtalkaboutweb.com/2008/04/14/was-firefox-logo-inspired-by-images-from-hubble-telescope/#comment-1314</guid>
		<description>That would be alot of displacement. Only god or photoshop can move galaxies around like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="NOMEDIATEXT">That would be alot of displacement. Only god or photoshop can move galaxies around like that.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asa Dotzler</title>
		<link>http://justtalkaboutweb.com/2008/04/14/was-firefox-logo-inspired-by-images-from-hubble-telescope/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>Asa Dotzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 04:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justtalkaboutweb.com/2008/04/14/was-firefox-logo-inspired-by-images-from-hubble-telescope/#comment-419</guid>
		<description>The image wasn't edited at all (and there's no such thing as upside-down in space so rotating an image is not meaningful) 

The reason that one image looks different is because the cloud formation and the light echo is changing over time and that's an older image. 

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:V838_Monocerotis_expansion.jpg for all of the images showing the progression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="NOMEDIATEXT">The image wasn&#8217;t edited at all (and there&#8217;s no such thing as upside-down in space so rotating an image is not meaningful) </p>
<p>The reason that one image looks different is because the cloud formation and the light echo is changing over time and that&#8217;s an older image. </p>
<p>See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:V838_Monocerotis_expansion.jpg" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:V838_Monocerotis_expansion.jpg');">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:V838_Monocerotis_expansion.jpg</a> for all of the images showing the progression.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
